| Geert Lovink on Mon, 23 Jun 1997 16:32:51 +0200 (MET DST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| <nettime> euro protests - last report part I |
A delayed, last report from Amsterdam, part I
About the protests against the Euro Summit
See also http://www.contrast.org/eurostop
Press release
Amsterdam, June 17th 1997
Alternative Summit presents Declaration of Amsterdam
Call not to ratify the undemocratic Treaty of Amsterdam
While on the Frederiksplein the heads of state and governments
move on with finalising the internal market and the introduction
of the euro, the Alternative Summit has presented its Alternative
Declaration of Amsterdam. This declaration is the reply to the
onesided policies of the European Union and its shortsighted focus
on economic and monetary policies. During the Alternative Summit a
changing group of well above 500 international participants have
taken part in workshops and debates about a different Europe than
the one currently shaped by the European Union governments. In the
Alternative Declaration of Amsterdam this different Europe is
outlined.
Appeal for a social, sustainable and democratic Europe
A first point of critique concerns the undemocratic procedure
which has lead to the Treaty of Amsterdam. Certainly in The
Netherlands there has been no serious debate about the future of
Europe. The process has not sufficiently involved the citizens and
cannot be considered democratic. The Treaty of Amsterdam does not
repair the democratic gap in the EU.
The introduction of the Economic and Monetary Union has far
reaching social impacts. To reach the EMU criteria, social
expenditure is cut dramatically. The 20 million unemployed and 50
million people in Europe living in poverty pay the price for the
euro.
The Treaty of Amsterdam lacks commitments in the direction of
changing course towards a sustainable economy. There is
insufficient intiatives to realise strong joint environmental
policies. The Dutch presidency has not fullfilled its obligation
on this area.
The declaration of the Alternative Summit calls the European and
national parliaments to reject the Amsterdam Treaty as long as the
basic principles of democracy have not been fullfilled. Movements
in every country of the EU will start campaigning for this joint
demand.
Agenda for Action
The declaration of the Alternative Summit ends with an agenda of
joint action agreed on by NGOs from all over Europe present at the
Alternative Summit. The plans, for the next six months and beyond,
focus on a stronger cooperation between NGOs working for a
different Europe, including mobilisation for a week of action in
early December.
Platform naar een Ander Europa /Dutch Coalition for a Different
Europe, Amsterdam
e-mail: ander.europa@xs4all.nl
-------------
More steps to go
Towards a different Europe
Alternative Summit in Amsterdam 17 June 1997
Everything indicates the European Council of Amsterdam will be a
failure. The promises the heads of states and governments made us
after 'Maastricht' have not been kept. This Council will resolve
neither the democratic crisis, nor the social crisis. The
inhabitants of Europe are now facing a fundamental choice:
continue on the current path or change course?
1.
Our continent is facing great social and ecological problems that
need to be dealt with internationally. This European Union, built
on 'Maastricht', on the big summits of heads of states and
governments, and on centralized bureaucratic bodies, did not meet
the challenge.
After the signing of the Maastricht treaty the European Union has
increasingly shifted power from the national parliaments to the
heads of states and governments, and shifted power from the
political sphere to the market. Western Europe is being turned
into a centralised political and strengthened military power,
allowing large Europe-based corporations to increase profits,
competiveness and market-shares worldwide. This European Union has
become a driving force of globalisation and promotor of
neoliberalism. It has become an elite-driven project, undemocratic
and irresponsive to the needs of people and nature. It offers but
an uncertain future for women, for the citizens of non-EU
countries that come here, for the next generations, for the
elderly and for the 20 million unemployed and 50 million people
living in poverty in the 15 member states.
Only de European inhabitants can build Europe, support it and live
in it. A European House that does not meet the wishes and values
of its population has no raison d'=EAtre. The supporters of this
European Union say there is no other option. Anyone opposing this
EU are portrayed as reactionary nationalists. Nothing is less
true, because there is a third option: cooperation for a
different, democratic, social, peaceful, solidary, ecological and
feminist Europe.
From June 12 - 17 we, the undersigned, and more than thousand
women and men gathered at the Alternative Summit Towards a
Different Europe to look for alternatives. On June 14th more than
50 000 people from all EU member states demonstrated in Amsterdam
against unemployment, insecurity and social exclusion. Together we
can mobilise for a Europe that eradicates unemployment, takes
social and ecological concerns seriously, creates equal
opportunities for men and women and is open and hospitable to
immigrants and refugees. We can create a Europe that breaks with
its shameful colonial past and becomes a peaceful, disarmed force
for a world of cooperation, sharing and solidarity.
We call upon all inhabitants of Western and Eastern Europe to join
hands for a change. For a cooperation based on democratic
participation of all inhabitants of Europe, and a public debate on
our social priorities. Therefor we say:
Halt to this EU. Give Europe a new chance.
2. Work
Today 20 million inhabitants of the European Union are unemployed,
according to official figures. We face a huge challenge to
generate paid labour for those who want it.
In 1985, the EU promised us 5 million new jobs. Unemployement has
doubled since. In order to enter the Economic and Monetary Union
and join the European currency governments are fixated on the
convergence criteria of Maastricht. All over Europe this leads to
enormous cuts in public services. This creates unemployment. The
Dublin Stability Pact will result in even more cuts and will
reduce the possibilities of member states to effectively stimulate
employment.
The EU seeks to reduce unemployment through 'flexibility' of the
labour markets. That means: weaker protection of workers' rights,
insecure and temporary jobs, and reduced rights to organise,
negotiate and act collectively. The first victims are women, as
workers, or as people looking for employment. Some in the EU
propose to lower unemployment by promoting large, capital
intensive infra-structure projects. These projects provide only
few, temporary, and often environmentally very damaging jobs in
the short term. They provide no real answer to Europe's needs.
Quite the contrary: projects like the Trans-European Networks
promote long distance trade and therefor break down local
economies, and costs jobs. The current policy in many countries to
force the unemployed to work or study for minimal benefits and
social rights is proof of the lack of respect of the victims of
these wrong policies.
We deman
---
# distributed via nettime-l : no commercial use without permission
# <nettime> is a closed moderated mailinglist for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info: majordomo@icf.de and "info nettime" in the msg body
# URL: http://www.desk.nl/~nettime/ contact: nettime-owner@icf.de